No Prison Sentence for Woman Convicted in Incident Alongside Montreal Doctor.

Wendy Devera

In Canada, only about 5% of sexual assault convictions get a community sentence. Yet, Quebec Court Judge Suzanne Costom decided on just that for Wendy Devera. She was given two years less a day, with no jail time.

This case caught a lot of attention in Montreal. The court decided that Devera, linked to Dr. Stephan Probst, would serve her time outside of prison. She had shown a lot of progress, including working with a sexologist on consent and accountability.

The crime was a serious one, involving sexual assault with another person. Judge Costom said Devera was unlikely to offend again. This was based on expert opinions and letters from others who knew her.

Probst, known for his work at the Jewish General Hospital, took his own life before he could face more charges. His name was spelled differently in court documents and media, showing the confusion in how it was reported.

The judge’s decision aims to balance punishment with helping Devera. It shows how the court weighs the need to protect society against the chance for change. This decision is part of a larger discussion about justice and rehabilitation.

Overview of the Montreal Case and Community Sentence

The Wendy Devera case caught a lot of attention in Quebec after a verdict at the Montreal courthouse. This article focuses on what the Quebec Court ordered. It also looks at why a community sentence was given and how it fits into the bigger picture. The story involves a woman from Montreal linked to a well-known medical figure from the general hospital Montreal network.

Quebec Court ruling and key takeaways from the sentencing hearing

At the sentencing hearing in Montreal, Judge Suzanne Costom decided on a community sentence of two years less a day. The first year will be under house arrest, followed by a curfew and strict conditions. The sentence also includes two years of probation and 240 hours of community service.

The Quebec Court considered the defendant’s efforts towards rehabilitation. This included consent education with a sexologist, steady work, and volunteer work helping the homeless. These efforts were key in the court’s decision in the Wendy Devera case.

Context: conviction for sexual assault involving another person under the Criminal Code

The conviction was for sexual assault with another person. This is a more serious offence under the Criminal Code than a single-perpetrator crime. The evidence showed actions in a private setting and a spa visit. It also mentioned a meeting arranged via an app, an unexpected man, a suspected drugged drink, resistance in the spa, and assaults that followed.

This context helps understand the montreal woman’s role and the co-accused. The co-accused’s connection to the general hospital Montreal community made the case more public.

How this roundup post frames the court’s findings and public interest

This article covers the key points of the Quebec Court ruling. It places the sentencing hearing in Montreal within a broader discussion. It shows how the legal outcome relates to community reaction, media scrutiny, and the ongoing focus on accountability.

By looking at the court’s reasoning and the documented evidence, the article explains why the Wendy Devera case is important. It shows why it remains a key topic for those following criminal law and the health sector in Montreal.

Sentencing Details: House Arrest, Community Conditions, and Probation

The court decided on a community sentence for the montreal woman. This was after she was convicted in a different case. The judge chose a plan that focuses on accountability and structure.

Two years less a day to be served in the community

The sentence is two years less a day. It will be served in the community. This choice means no jail time but strict supervision and rules.

First 12 months under house arrest, followed by curfew and conditions

The first year is house arrest in Montreal. There are exceptions for work, medical needs, and court programs. The second year has a curfew and specific conditions set by the court.

Two years of probation and 240 hours of community service

After the community term, there are two years of probation and 240 hours of community service. These steps help ensure the montreal woman stays connected to the community.

Component Length Core Requirements Purpose
Community term 2 years minus 1 day Conditional sentence; compliance checks Community sentence Quebec focused on accountability
House arrest Months 1–12 House arrest Montreal with limited exceptions Stability, deterrence, and close monitoring
Curfew phase Months 13–24 Curfew plus court-imposed conditions Gradual reintegration with safeguards
Probation 2 years Ongoing reporting; program participation Supervision under probation conditions
Community service 240 hours Verified service placements Restorative contribution by the montreal woman

Judicial Reasoning: Rehabilitation, Risk Assessment, and Proportionality

The court carefully examined the case, using Quebec Court reasoning and the facts. They focused on rehabilitation, consent education, and if the sentence was fair. They looked at Wendy Devera’s situation and the context of the crime.

Judge Suzanne Costom’s assessment of rehabilitation and consent education with a sexologist

Judge Suzanne Costom highlighted Wendy Devera’s efforts to change. She worked with a sexologist on consent education. Reports showed she was making progress and understanding boundaries better.

Her work and volunteer activities showed she was moving forward. This supported her rehabilitation plan.

“Exceptionally weak” risk of reoffending and the role of character evidence

The court found Wendy Devera’s risk of reoffending to be very low. Character evidence showed she was stable and had strong community ties. The judge also noted the difficult relationship with Stephan Probst had ended.

This made the incident an isolated event, not a pattern for Wendy Devera.

Why a community-based sentence met denunciation and deterrence objectives

Proportional sentencing in Quebec Court aimed for accountability but not too much. A community order with supervision and programs was seen as fitting. It balanced denunciation, deterrence, and keeping rehabilitation in mind.

This approach was suitable for Wendy Devera’s case. It considered her lack of past crimes and her compliance with the order.

Sex Offender Registry Canada Decision and Legal Thresholds

In the Wendy Devera case, the court looked at legal thresholds for the sex offender registry Canada. The decision followed Quebec’s sentencing rules. It focused on proportionality for public safety and fair punishment.

Why the criteria for the sex offender registry were not met

Justice considered the crime, risk, and change in the offender. There was proof of rehabilitation and low risk of reoffending. This balance didn’t meet the legal standards for a 20-year listing on the registry.

How registry decisions interact with proportional sentencing

Courts match punishments to harm and risk. Adding a registry can be too much if a community sentence already covers denunciation and deterrence. In the Wendy Devera case, the court followed Canadian rules for using the registry.

Implications for similar cases in Canada

Future cases will depend on the facts: the crime, treatment steps, and risk. Quebec’s sentencing rules show that registry decisions are not automatic. They depend on proportionality and legal standards, applied to each case.

Connection to Dr. Stephan Probst and Related Allegations

The Montreal doctor case grew bigger as Stephan Probst’s role became known. Court documents and police records were shared. This included the Jewish General Hospital and new claims against the doctor.

Background on Probst, former head of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital

Stephan Probst was once in charge of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital. He was accused of sexual assault with Wendy Devera. This made him a key figure in the case.

Public records show Stephan Probst’s professional life and disciplinary actions. This helps understand how a hospital leader became involved in a criminal case.

Probst’s death by suicide before sentencing on additional charges

In June 2025, Stephan Probst took his own life before sentencing. This stopped the court process and left many steps unfulfilled.

There were more charges against him, but they were put on hold. This limited the chance to fully investigate and prove new allegations.

Accusations from multiple women and pending civil litigation against his estate

Before his death, Stephan Probst faced charges from seven more women. These incidents happened from 2003 to 2020. After he died, two women sued his estate for damages.

The lawsuits claimed similar patterns of behavior. They also accused him of hiding assets. Stephan Probst’s name is mentioned in both civil and criminal cases. The case continues to involve the Jewish General Hospital and new allegations.

Key Aspect Details Reported Relevance to Case
Hospital Role Former head of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital Positions Stephan Probst within general hospital Montreal context
Criminal Timeline Co‑accused in the X conviction; death by suicide in June 2025 Impacts sentencing stages and evidence testing
Additional Allegations Subsequent charges tied to seven more women (2003–2020) Expands scope of the Montreal doctor case
Civil Actions Lawsuits by A and G seeking over $300,000 each from the estate Introduces financial claims and asset‑related assertions
Public Record References to stephen probst and Stephan Probst across filings Ensures consistent identification amid overlapping proceedings

Civil Lawsuits and Asset Transfers Alleged Before Probst’s Death

A dimly lit office, the air thick with the weight of unresolved legal disputes. In the foreground, a cluttered desk overflows with files and documents, hinting at the complex web of civil lawsuits and asset transfers that unfolded before Probst's untimely demise. The walls are lined with bookshelves, casting long shadows that lend an ominous atmosphere to the scene. Through the window, the city skyline looms, a reminder of the broader context in which these events transpired. The lighting is somber, with a warm glow from a single desk lamp illuminating the chaos, lending a sense of urgency and unease to the proceedings. The overall composition conveys the intricate, high-stakes nature of the legal disputes that preceded the tragedy.

After the August 2024 convictions, civil lawsuits in Montreal have been filed against the Stephan Probst estate. These lawsuits claim that Wendy Devera was involved in real estate and corporate changes. They aim to trace funds and show intent. But, none of these claims have been proven in court yet.

Claims by plaintiffs A and G and alleged mirrored patterns from case X

Two women, A and G, have filed lawsuits in Montreal. They are seeking over $300,000 from the Stephan Probst estate. They say Probst’s actions were similar to those in case X, including using Wendy Devera to recruit victims.

A claims Devera contacted her on a dating app in 2018-2019. They met at Probst’s home. A also says she saw an attempt to sexually assault an unconscious woman in 2020. G alleges being drugged and sexually assaulted from 2012, but does not mention Devera.

Alleged $0 property transfers to Devera and subsequent condo sale

The lawsuits claim Probst transferred two homes to Wendy Devera for $0 in May 2025. Devera then sold a condo for $470,000 and kept another luxury condo. This was bought by Probst in 2017 for over $1.2 million.

The lawsuits say these moves were to hide assets from creditors. They claim the transfers were done to stop victims from getting their money back.

Business directorship change and insolvency allegations in court filings

Devera became a director of Stephan Probst Medical Services on May 15, 2025. The timing of these changes and real estate moves is linked to insolvency allegations.

Below is a summary drawn from the pleadings and registries cited in the cases.

Element Details from Filings Relevance to Claims
Plaintiffs and Claims Plaintiffs A and G seek damages exceeding $300,000 each from the Stephan Probst estate Establishes scope of civil lawsuits Montreal and financial exposure
Alleged Conduct Pattern Mirrored elements from case X; A alleges recruitment via Wendy Devera; G alleges drugging and assaults Supports theory of repeated, patterned behaviour
Real Estate Transfers Two properties moved in May 2025 via property transfers $0 to Wendy Devera Forms basis for claims of gratuitous transfers
Asset Disposition Plateau‑Mont‑Royal condo sold for $470,000; downtown condo retained, originally bought in 2017 for $1.2M+ Used to trace possible proceeds and asset location
Corporate Governance Devera named director of Stephan Probst Medical Services on May 15, 2025 Links corporate control to timing of transactions
Financial Theory Insolvency allegations assert intent to frustrate creditors and victims Framework for possible asset recovery actions
Procedural Status Allegations not yet tested in court Clarifies current legal posture

The lawsuits show a clear timeline of events. They link property transfers, corporate actions, and asset sales. Lawyers for the plaintiffs believe this timeline is important for understanding the Stephan Probst estate and Wendy Devera‘s role. The court will decide based on the evidence.

Immigration Considerations and Community Impact in Canada

The case is at a critical point, blending immigration rules with local accountability. As a permanent resident in Canada, there are specific legal standards to meet. The sentence’s structure impacts both the right to appeal and community expectations.

Permanent resident status, the risk of expulsion, and the impact on appeals

The individual is a permanent resident in Canada and faces the risk of expulsion under federal law. The court’s decision to impose a community-based sentence instead of jail time keeps the door open for appeals. This allows the legal process to continue while the person serves their sentence in the community.

Community service, volunteer work with the homeless, and public reaction

Before the court, there were reports of consistent community service in Montreal. This included delivering meals to the homeless after the conviction. People and service providers believe that visible volunteer work can help repair relationships while the sentence is served in the community. This approach matches with probation goals, aiming for accountability, skill-building, and support from networks.

Resources for crisis support and reporting sexual violence in Canada

  • Call 988 for Canada’s Suicide Crisis Helpline for immediate, confidential support.
  • Kids Help Phone: 1-800-668-6868, text 686868, or use live chat for youth support.
  • Find a 24-hour centre via the Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention resources.
  • Follow CAMH guidance for safe conversations about suicide; dial 911 if in immediate danger.
  • Search local services through the Ending Sexual Violence Association of Canada to access counselling and reporting options.

These national and local resources help people deal with trauma, plan for safety, or report incidents. They also help communities understand the impact of the sentence on daily life.

Media Coverage, Public Interest, and Ethical Reporting

A bustling newsroom, dimly lit with a warm, investigative atmosphere. In the foreground, a journalist intently poring over files and documents, their face illuminated by the glow of a computer screen. Behind them, editors and producers engaged in animated discussions, phones ringing, papers rustling. In the background, large screens display news headlines and footage, hinting at the powerful and often controversial nature of the story being covered. The scene conveys the weight of media responsibility, the public's insatiable appetite for information, and the delicate balance of ethical reporting.

Canadian newsrooms handled this case with great care. They followed open court principles and considered the harm it could cause. Their coverage in Montreal focused on the context and legal details, while keeping survivors’ identities safe.

This approach is in line with ethical reporting in Canada. It supports public interest journalism without being too sensational.

How Canadian outlets framed the court decision and lawsuits

Major newspapers explained the judge’s reasons for the decision. They talked about rehabilitation, low risk, and fairness. They also mentioned that the person won’t be on the sex offender registry.

A national broadcaster compared the criminal ruling to ongoing civil lawsuits and alleged asset moves. They called these actions untested in court. This coverage showed why the story kept getting attention and how it highlights the importance of public interest journalism.

Balancing survivor privacy with the public’s right to know

Editors used initials to protect the identities of those who complained. They focused on court documents and decisions, not personal details. This shows respect for privacy while keeping readers informed about the legal process.

Responsible language around suicide and trauma

Coverage mentioned Stephan Probst’s death by suicide in a careful, non-graphic way. They avoided details about the method and framed the event accurately. They also included resources for those who might be struggling.

This approach to suicide and trauma reporting is guided by responsible language. It aims to minimize harm and provide clear, easy-to-understand information.

Editorial Practice Applied Approach Public Value
Framing rulings Explained rehabilitation, risk, and proportionality; clarified registry outcome Supports informed Montreal court coverage
Civil context Outlined lawsuits and alleged asset moves with explicit disclaimers Enhances public interest journalism while avoiding prejudice
Privacy and anonymity Used initials and removed identifying details of survivors Aligns with ethical reporting Canada and legal standards
Suicide reporting Used careful wording, no method, and included help resources Models responsible language suicide and reduces contagion risk

Wendy Devera

Public records and court documents shed light on this Montreal case. They show how the sentence, community conditions, and support affected the individual. People often look at the Wendy Devera bio, website, and portfolio to understand the situation.

Profile context and court-noted relationship dynamic with Probst

In Quebec Court, a short-lived relationship with Dr. Stephan Probst was discussed. It was noted that Wendy Devera ended the relationship before his death. The case’s progression has increased interest in the Wendy Devera blog and contact information.

Rehabilitation steps: consent education and professional support

The sentencing mentioned Wendy Devera’s work with a sexologist on consent. She also volunteered with unhoused people in Montreal. This has led to searches for Wendy Devera services and a Wendy Devera SEO specialist profile.

Search interest trends and related keywords: montreal woman, general hospital Montreal

Search data often focuses on location and institutions. It links “montreal woman” with “general hospital Montreal.” This shows how news stories connect court reporting and local health networks. People look for the Wendy Devera website, portfolio, and blog for updates.

Related search terms: stephan probst, stephen probst, rocket doctor Quebec, entourage spa, house doctor, Hockey Canada

Readers often search for terms like stephan probst and stephen probst, Rocket Doctor Quebec, Entourage Spa, house doctor, and Hockey Canada. These searches show how readers connect names and places in articles. They also look for direct information, like Wendy Devera contact, services, or a Wendy Devera SEO specialist listing.

Conclusion

The Wendy Devera case summary shows a clear Quebec Court decision. The court gave her a community sentence of two years minus a day. This included 12 months of house arrest, followed by a curfew and strict rules.

She also got two years of probation and 240 hours of community service. The judge said she had completed consent education and had a very low risk of reoffending. The court decided not to list her on the sex offender registry Canada.

Context is important. Allegations against Dr. Stephan Probst led to more scrutiny. Before his death by suicide in June 2025, seven women came forward. Civil suits by A and G against his estate are ongoing, involving disputed property transfers and a late directorship change naming Devera.

These factors were considered in the Montreal sentencing roundup. Yet, the Quebec Court decision was based on solid evidence. The ruling aimed to balance punishment and rehabilitation with a community sentence.

For a permanent resident, immigration impacts are a concern. But the court’s approach focused on risk, character evidence, and close supervision. This case summary highlights how sentencing aims to protect the public and support accountability.

It shows that the goal is to reduce harm and encourage change without resorting to harsh measures. As this Quebec Court decision enters public discussion, ethical reporting is key. It’s important to focus on survivors, use careful language, and direct readers to support services.

In conclusion, the Montreal sentencing roundup shows a justice system that carefully weighs facts. It calibrates conditions and sets out a community sentence to reduce harm and foster change.

FAQ

What did the Quebec Court rule in the sentencing of the Montreal woman, Wendy Devera?

Judge Suzanne Costom gave Wendy Devera a community sentence of two years less one day. The first year is house arrest, followed by a year with a curfew and conditions. She must also do two years of probation and 240 hours of community service. The court did not order jail time.

Why is the conviction for sexual assault involving another person treated more seriously?

The Criminal Code sees sexual assault with another person as more serious. It shows more power dynamics and harm. The court recognized its gravity while balancing the sentence.

How does this roundup frame the court’s findings and public interest?

It summarizes the conditional sentence and the judge’s focus on rehabilitation. It also mentions ongoing civil actions and resources for readers. This shows strong public interest in Montreal and across Canada.

What does “two years less a day” mean in practice?

It’s a community sentence served outside jail. Devera will be under strict supervision for 12 months at home. Then, she’ll have a curfew and conditions for another 12 months. It allows for closer rehabilitation while keeping accountability.

What are the house arrest and curfew conditions?

For the first 12 months, Devera must stay at home except for approved activities. The next 12 months will have a curfew and court-ordered conditions. These will be monitored by community supervision.

What are the probation and community service requirements?

After the community sentence, Devera must do two years of probation. This includes 240 hours of community service. These measures support rehabilitation and community accountability.

How did the judge assess rehabilitation and consent education?

Judge Costom credited Devera’s work with a sexologist focused on consent. She also looked at expert evaluations and letters of support. The court found she had started rehabilitation before sentencing and showed insight into boundaries and consent.

Why did the court find an “exceptionally weak” risk of reoffending?

Expert reports and character evidence suggested the offence was out of character. The judge concluded Devera would likely not have offended without her relationship with Stephan Probst.

Why was a community‑based sentence seen as proportional and deterrent?

The court believed strict community controls, house arrest, and long probation could meet denunciation and deterrence. This was done while prioritizing rehabilitation due to the isolated incident and lack of prior convictions.

Why was Devera not placed on Canada’s sex offender registry?

The judge found the legal criteria were not met. This was due to her demonstrated rehabilitation, minimal risk, and case-specific circumstances. The proportional sentence was considered sufficient to protect the public.

How do registry decisions relate to proportional sentencing?

Courts weigh risk, rehabilitation, and the offence context. If denunciation and deterrence are achieved without a registry listing, and risk is low, judges may decline to impose registration.

What might this mean for similar cases in Canada?

It reinforces that registry placement is case-specific. Courts examine risk assessments, rehabilitation steps, and character evidence alongside the seriousness of the offence.

Who was Dr. Stephan Probst, and how is he connected?

Probst was the former head of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and Devera’s co-accused. Both were convicted in the incident involving victim X.

What happened to Probst before sentencing?

Probst died by suicide in June 2025 before he could be sentenced and after being charged with additional sexual assaults. Help resources are listed below for anyone affected by this topic.

Were there other accusations and civil actions related to Probst?

Prosecutors charged Probst with additional assaults alleged by several women. Two women, identified as A and G, filed civil suits against his estate. Their allegations have not been tested in court.

What do the civil lawsuits by A and G allege?

A alleges she was recruited by Devera via an app and that Probst participated without consent; G alleges Probst drugged and assaulted her starting in 2012 and does not allege misconduct by Devera. These claims remain before the civil courts.

What are the allegations about property transfers and a condo sale?

Court filings claim Probst transferred two properties to Devera for What did the Quebec Court rule in the sentencing of the Montreal woman, Wendy Devera?Judge Suzanne Costom gave Wendy Devera a community sentence of two years less one day. The first year is house arrest, followed by a year with a curfew and conditions. She must also do two years of probation and 240 hours of community service. The court did not order jail time.Why is the conviction for sexual assault involving another person treated more seriously?The Criminal Code sees sexual assault with another person as more serious. It shows more power dynamics and harm. The court recognized its gravity while balancing the sentence.How does this roundup frame the court’s findings and public interest?It summarizes the conditional sentence and the judge’s focus on rehabilitation. It also mentions ongoing civil actions and resources for readers. This shows strong public interest in Montreal and across Canada.What does “two years less a day” mean in practice?It’s a community sentence served outside jail. Devera will be under strict supervision for 12 months at home. Then, she’ll have a curfew and conditions for another 12 months. It allows for closer rehabilitation while keeping accountability.What are the house arrest and curfew conditions?For the first 12 months, Devera must stay at home except for approved activities. The next 12 months will have a curfew and court-ordered conditions. These will be monitored by community supervision.What are the probation and community service requirements?After the community sentence, Devera must do two years of probation. This includes 240 hours of community service. These measures support rehabilitation and community accountability.How did the judge assess rehabilitation and consent education?Judge Costom credited Devera’s work with a sexologist focused on consent. She also looked at expert evaluations and letters of support. The court found she had started rehabilitation before sentencing and showed insight into boundaries and consent.Why did the court find an “exceptionally weak” risk of reoffending?Expert reports and character evidence suggested the offence was out of character. The judge concluded Devera would likely not have offended without her relationship with Stephan Probst.Why was a community‑based sentence seen as proportional and deterrent?The court believed strict community controls, house arrest, and long probation could meet denunciation and deterrence. This was done while prioritizing rehabilitation due to the isolated incident and lack of prior convictions.Why was Devera not placed on Canada’s sex offender registry?The judge found the legal criteria were not met. This was due to her demonstrated rehabilitation, minimal risk, and case-specific circumstances. The proportional sentence was considered sufficient to protect the public.How do registry decisions relate to proportional sentencing?Courts weigh risk, rehabilitation, and the offence context. If denunciation and deterrence are achieved without a registry listing, and risk is low, judges may decline to impose registration.What might this mean for similar cases in Canada?It reinforces that registry placement is case-specific. Courts examine risk assessments, rehabilitation steps, and character evidence alongside the seriousness of the offence.Who was Dr. Stephan Probst, and how is he connected?Probst was the former head of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and Devera’s co-accused. Both were convicted in the incident involving victim X.What happened to Probst before sentencing?Probst died by suicide in June 2025 before he could be sentenced and after being charged with additional sexual assaults. Help resources are listed below for anyone affected by this topic.Were there other accusations and civil actions related to Probst?Prosecutors charged Probst with additional assaults alleged by several women. Two women, identified as A and G, filed civil suits against his estate. Their allegations have not been tested in court.What do the civil lawsuits by A and G allege?A alleges she was recruited by Devera via an app and that Probst participated without consent; G alleges Probst drugged and assaulted her starting in 2012 and does not allege misconduct by Devera. These claims remain before the civil courts.What are the allegations about property transfers and a condo sale?Court filings claim Probst transferred two properties to Devera for

FAQ

What did the Quebec Court rule in the sentencing of the Montreal woman, Wendy Devera?

Judge Suzanne Costom gave Wendy Devera a community sentence of two years less one day. The first year is house arrest, followed by a year with a curfew and conditions. She must also do two years of probation and 240 hours of community service. The court did not order jail time.

Why is the conviction for sexual assault involving another person treated more seriously?

The Criminal Code sees sexual assault with another person as more serious. It shows more power dynamics and harm. The court recognized its gravity while balancing the sentence.

How does this roundup frame the court’s findings and public interest?

It summarizes the conditional sentence and the judge’s focus on rehabilitation. It also mentions ongoing civil actions and resources for readers. This shows strong public interest in Montreal and across Canada.

What does “two years less a day” mean in practice?

It’s a community sentence served outside jail. Devera will be under strict supervision for 12 months at home. Then, she’ll have a curfew and conditions for another 12 months. It allows for closer rehabilitation while keeping accountability.

What are the house arrest and curfew conditions?

For the first 12 months, Devera must stay at home except for approved activities. The next 12 months will have a curfew and court-ordered conditions. These will be monitored by community supervision.

What are the probation and community service requirements?

After the community sentence, Devera must do two years of probation. This includes 240 hours of community service. These measures support rehabilitation and community accountability.

How did the judge assess rehabilitation and consent education?

Judge Costom credited Devera’s work with a sexologist focused on consent. She also looked at expert evaluations and letters of support. The court found she had started rehabilitation before sentencing and showed insight into boundaries and consent.

Why did the court find an “exceptionally weak” risk of reoffending?

Expert reports and character evidence suggested the offence was out of character. The judge concluded Devera would likely not have offended without her relationship with Stephan Probst.

Why was a community‑based sentence seen as proportional and deterrent?

The court believed strict community controls, house arrest, and long probation could meet denunciation and deterrence. This was done while prioritizing rehabilitation due to the isolated incident and lack of prior convictions.

Why was Devera not placed on Canada’s sex offender registry?

The judge found the legal criteria were not met. This was due to her demonstrated rehabilitation, minimal risk, and case-specific circumstances. The proportional sentence was considered sufficient to protect the public.

How do registry decisions relate to proportional sentencing?

Courts weigh risk, rehabilitation, and the offence context. If denunciation and deterrence are achieved without a registry listing, and risk is low, judges may decline to impose registration.

What might this mean for similar cases in Canada?

It reinforces that registry placement is case-specific. Courts examine risk assessments, rehabilitation steps, and character evidence alongside the seriousness of the offence.

Who was Dr. Stephan Probst, and how is he connected?

Probst was the former head of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and Devera’s co-accused. Both were convicted in the incident involving victim X.

What happened to Probst before sentencing?

Probst died by suicide in June 2025 before he could be sentenced and after being charged with additional sexual assaults. Help resources are listed below for anyone affected by this topic.

Were there other accusations and civil actions related to Probst?

Prosecutors charged Probst with additional assaults alleged by several women. Two women, identified as A and G, filed civil suits against his estate. Their allegations have not been tested in court.

What do the civil lawsuits by A and G allege?

A alleges she was recruited by Devera via an app and that Probst participated without consent; G alleges Probst drugged and assaulted her starting in 2012 and does not allege misconduct by Devera. These claims remain before the civil courts.

What are the allegations about property transfers and a condo sale?

Court filings claim Probst transferred two properties to Devera for

FAQ

What did the Quebec Court rule in the sentencing of the Montreal woman, Wendy Devera?

Judge Suzanne Costom gave Wendy Devera a community sentence of two years less one day. The first year is house arrest, followed by a year with a curfew and conditions. She must also do two years of probation and 240 hours of community service. The court did not order jail time.

Why is the conviction for sexual assault involving another person treated more seriously?

The Criminal Code sees sexual assault with another person as more serious. It shows more power dynamics and harm. The court recognized its gravity while balancing the sentence.

How does this roundup frame the court’s findings and public interest?

It summarizes the conditional sentence and the judge’s focus on rehabilitation. It also mentions ongoing civil actions and resources for readers. This shows strong public interest in Montreal and across Canada.

What does “two years less a day” mean in practice?

It’s a community sentence served outside jail. Devera will be under strict supervision for 12 months at home. Then, she’ll have a curfew and conditions for another 12 months. It allows for closer rehabilitation while keeping accountability.

What are the house arrest and curfew conditions?

For the first 12 months, Devera must stay at home except for approved activities. The next 12 months will have a curfew and court-ordered conditions. These will be monitored by community supervision.

What are the probation and community service requirements?

After the community sentence, Devera must do two years of probation. This includes 240 hours of community service. These measures support rehabilitation and community accountability.

How did the judge assess rehabilitation and consent education?

Judge Costom credited Devera’s work with a sexologist focused on consent. She also looked at expert evaluations and letters of support. The court found she had started rehabilitation before sentencing and showed insight into boundaries and consent.

Why did the court find an “exceptionally weak” risk of reoffending?

Expert reports and character evidence suggested the offence was out of character. The judge concluded Devera would likely not have offended without her relationship with Stephan Probst.

Why was a community‑based sentence seen as proportional and deterrent?

The court believed strict community controls, house arrest, and long probation could meet denunciation and deterrence. This was done while prioritizing rehabilitation due to the isolated incident and lack of prior convictions.

Why was Devera not placed on Canada’s sex offender registry?

The judge found the legal criteria were not met. This was due to her demonstrated rehabilitation, minimal risk, and case-specific circumstances. The proportional sentence was considered sufficient to protect the public.

How do registry decisions relate to proportional sentencing?

Courts weigh risk, rehabilitation, and the offence context. If denunciation and deterrence are achieved without a registry listing, and risk is low, judges may decline to impose registration.

What might this mean for similar cases in Canada?

It reinforces that registry placement is case-specific. Courts examine risk assessments, rehabilitation steps, and character evidence alongside the seriousness of the offence.

Who was Dr. Stephan Probst, and how is he connected?

Probst was the former head of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and Devera’s co-accused. Both were convicted in the incident involving victim X.

What happened to Probst before sentencing?

Probst died by suicide in June 2025 before he could be sentenced and after being charged with additional sexual assaults. Help resources are listed below for anyone affected by this topic.

Were there other accusations and civil actions related to Probst?

Prosecutors charged Probst with additional assaults alleged by several women. Two women, identified as A and G, filed civil suits against his estate. Their allegations have not been tested in court.

What do the civil lawsuits by A and G allege?

A alleges she was recruited by Devera via an app and that Probst participated without consent; G alleges Probst drugged and assaulted her starting in 2012 and does not allege misconduct by Devera. These claims remain before the civil courts.

What are the allegations about property transfers and a condo sale?

Court filings claim Probst transferred two properties to Devera for $0 in May 2025. Shortly after, a Plateau-Mont-Royal condo was sold for $470,000, and a downtown condo originally purchased for more than $1.2 million remained with Devera. Plaintiffs allege these moves aimed to frustrate creditors; none of these allegations have been proven.

What is known about business directorship changes?

Records indicate Probst named Devera a director of Stephan Probst Medical Services on May 15, 2025, weeks before his death. Plaintiffs cite this in alleging attempts to shield assets, which is contested and unproven.

How does Devera’s permanent resident status affect immigration risks?

Because she did not receive a custodial sentence of six months or more, she can challenge a removal order. The community sentence and probation shape how appeals can proceed under Canadian immigration rules.

What community work did the court consider at sentencing?

The judge noted Devera’s volunteer work delivering meals to unhoused people after conviction. This supported the finding of rehabilitation and a low risk to the public.

Where can people find crisis support and sexual violence resources in Canada?

Call 988 for Canada’s Suicide Crisis Helpline. Kids Help Phone is at 1‑800‑668‑6868, text 686868, or live chat. The Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention lists 24-hour centres. CAMH provides guidance on discussing suicide. For sexual violence support, see the Ending Sexual Violence Association of Canada database or call 911 in immediate danger.

How did Canadian media frame the court decision and related lawsuits?

Outlets emphasized the judge’s reasoning—rehabilitation, minimal risk, proportionality—while reporting on additional charges against Probst and civil filings. Coverage balanced open court principles with careful language and context.

How is survivor privacy balanced with public interest?

Media used initials such as X, A, and G, protected identifying details, and reported facts tested in court. This aligns with Canadian standards on trauma-informed reporting.

What language guidelines were followed around suicide and trauma?

Reports avoided sensational details, included verified timelines, and provided help resources. This follows national guidance to reduce harm.

What context did the court provide about Wendy Devera’s relationship with Probst?

Judge Costom described the relationship as an anomaly relative to Devera’s character. She noted Devera ended it before Probst’s death. This factored into assessing risk and rehabilitation.

What rehabilitation steps did Devera take?

She completed sessions with a sexologist focused on consent, maintained steady work, and engaged in volunteer service. Expert evaluations and letters of support reinforced these steps.

Why are terms like “Montreal woman” and “general hospital Montreal” appearing in searches?

Public interest in the case drives searches linking Devera’s name to Montreal institutions and related topics. This includes Stephan Probst, Rocket Doctor Quebec, Entourage Spa, House Doctor, and Hockey Canada sexual assault.

Where can readers find more about Wendy Devera online?

Searches may surface terms such as Wendy Devera website, Wendy Devera bio, Wendy Devera portfolio, Wendy Devera SEO specialist, Wendy Devera services, Wendy Devera contact, and Wendy Devera blog. Always verify sources and distinguish court-established facts from unverified claims.

in May 2025. Shortly after, a Plateau-Mont-Royal condo was sold for 0,000, and a downtown condo originally purchased for more than

FAQ

What did the Quebec Court rule in the sentencing of the Montreal woman, Wendy Devera?

Judge Suzanne Costom gave Wendy Devera a community sentence of two years less one day. The first year is house arrest, followed by a year with a curfew and conditions. She must also do two years of probation and 240 hours of community service. The court did not order jail time.

Why is the conviction for sexual assault involving another person treated more seriously?

The Criminal Code sees sexual assault with another person as more serious. It shows more power dynamics and harm. The court recognized its gravity while balancing the sentence.

How does this roundup frame the court’s findings and public interest?

It summarizes the conditional sentence and the judge’s focus on rehabilitation. It also mentions ongoing civil actions and resources for readers. This shows strong public interest in Montreal and across Canada.

What does “two years less a day” mean in practice?

It’s a community sentence served outside jail. Devera will be under strict supervision for 12 months at home. Then, she’ll have a curfew and conditions for another 12 months. It allows for closer rehabilitation while keeping accountability.

What are the house arrest and curfew conditions?

For the first 12 months, Devera must stay at home except for approved activities. The next 12 months will have a curfew and court-ordered conditions. These will be monitored by community supervision.

What are the probation and community service requirements?

After the community sentence, Devera must do two years of probation. This includes 240 hours of community service. These measures support rehabilitation and community accountability.

How did the judge assess rehabilitation and consent education?

Judge Costom credited Devera’s work with a sexologist focused on consent. She also looked at expert evaluations and letters of support. The court found she had started rehabilitation before sentencing and showed insight into boundaries and consent.

Why did the court find an “exceptionally weak” risk of reoffending?

Expert reports and character evidence suggested the offence was out of character. The judge concluded Devera would likely not have offended without her relationship with Stephan Probst.

Why was a community‑based sentence seen as proportional and deterrent?

The court believed strict community controls, house arrest, and long probation could meet denunciation and deterrence. This was done while prioritizing rehabilitation due to the isolated incident and lack of prior convictions.

Why was Devera not placed on Canada’s sex offender registry?

The judge found the legal criteria were not met. This was due to her demonstrated rehabilitation, minimal risk, and case-specific circumstances. The proportional sentence was considered sufficient to protect the public.

How do registry decisions relate to proportional sentencing?

Courts weigh risk, rehabilitation, and the offence context. If denunciation and deterrence are achieved without a registry listing, and risk is low, judges may decline to impose registration.

What might this mean for similar cases in Canada?

It reinforces that registry placement is case-specific. Courts examine risk assessments, rehabilitation steps, and character evidence alongside the seriousness of the offence.

Who was Dr. Stephan Probst, and how is he connected?

Probst was the former head of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and Devera’s co-accused. Both were convicted in the incident involving victim X.

What happened to Probst before sentencing?

Probst died by suicide in June 2025 before he could be sentenced and after being charged with additional sexual assaults. Help resources are listed below for anyone affected by this topic.

Were there other accusations and civil actions related to Probst?

Prosecutors charged Probst with additional assaults alleged by several women. Two women, identified as A and G, filed civil suits against his estate. Their allegations have not been tested in court.

What do the civil lawsuits by A and G allege?

A alleges she was recruited by Devera via an app and that Probst participated without consent; G alleges Probst drugged and assaulted her starting in 2012 and does not allege misconduct by Devera. These claims remain before the civil courts.

What are the allegations about property transfers and a condo sale?

Court filings claim Probst transferred two properties to Devera for

FAQ

What did the Quebec Court rule in the sentencing of the Montreal woman, Wendy Devera?

Judge Suzanne Costom gave Wendy Devera a community sentence of two years less one day. The first year is house arrest, followed by a year with a curfew and conditions. She must also do two years of probation and 240 hours of community service. The court did not order jail time.

Why is the conviction for sexual assault involving another person treated more seriously?

The Criminal Code sees sexual assault with another person as more serious. It shows more power dynamics and harm. The court recognized its gravity while balancing the sentence.

How does this roundup frame the court’s findings and public interest?

It summarizes the conditional sentence and the judge’s focus on rehabilitation. It also mentions ongoing civil actions and resources for readers. This shows strong public interest in Montreal and across Canada.

What does “two years less a day” mean in practice?

It’s a community sentence served outside jail. Devera will be under strict supervision for 12 months at home. Then, she’ll have a curfew and conditions for another 12 months. It allows for closer rehabilitation while keeping accountability.

What are the house arrest and curfew conditions?

For the first 12 months, Devera must stay at home except for approved activities. The next 12 months will have a curfew and court-ordered conditions. These will be monitored by community supervision.

What are the probation and community service requirements?

After the community sentence, Devera must do two years of probation. This includes 240 hours of community service. These measures support rehabilitation and community accountability.

How did the judge assess rehabilitation and consent education?

Judge Costom credited Devera’s work with a sexologist focused on consent. She also looked at expert evaluations and letters of support. The court found she had started rehabilitation before sentencing and showed insight into boundaries and consent.

Why did the court find an “exceptionally weak” risk of reoffending?

Expert reports and character evidence suggested the offence was out of character. The judge concluded Devera would likely not have offended without her relationship with Stephan Probst.

Why was a community‑based sentence seen as proportional and deterrent?

The court believed strict community controls, house arrest, and long probation could meet denunciation and deterrence. This was done while prioritizing rehabilitation due to the isolated incident and lack of prior convictions.

Why was Devera not placed on Canada’s sex offender registry?

The judge found the legal criteria were not met. This was due to her demonstrated rehabilitation, minimal risk, and case-specific circumstances. The proportional sentence was considered sufficient to protect the public.

How do registry decisions relate to proportional sentencing?

Courts weigh risk, rehabilitation, and the offence context. If denunciation and deterrence are achieved without a registry listing, and risk is low, judges may decline to impose registration.

What might this mean for similar cases in Canada?

It reinforces that registry placement is case-specific. Courts examine risk assessments, rehabilitation steps, and character evidence alongside the seriousness of the offence.

Who was Dr. Stephan Probst, and how is he connected?

Probst was the former head of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and Devera’s co-accused. Both were convicted in the incident involving victim X.

What happened to Probst before sentencing?

Probst died by suicide in June 2025 before he could be sentenced and after being charged with additional sexual assaults. Help resources are listed below for anyone affected by this topic.

Were there other accusations and civil actions related to Probst?

Prosecutors charged Probst with additional assaults alleged by several women. Two women, identified as A and G, filed civil suits against his estate. Their allegations have not been tested in court.

What do the civil lawsuits by A and G allege?

A alleges she was recruited by Devera via an app and that Probst participated without consent; G alleges Probst drugged and assaulted her starting in 2012 and does not allege misconduct by Devera. These claims remain before the civil courts.

What are the allegations about property transfers and a condo sale?

Court filings claim Probst transferred two properties to Devera for $0 in May 2025. Shortly after, a Plateau-Mont-Royal condo was sold for $470,000, and a downtown condo originally purchased for more than $1.2 million remained with Devera. Plaintiffs allege these moves aimed to frustrate creditors; none of these allegations have been proven.

What is known about business directorship changes?

Records indicate Probst named Devera a director of Stephan Probst Medical Services on May 15, 2025, weeks before his death. Plaintiffs cite this in alleging attempts to shield assets, which is contested and unproven.

How does Devera’s permanent resident status affect immigration risks?

Because she did not receive a custodial sentence of six months or more, she can challenge a removal order. The community sentence and probation shape how appeals can proceed under Canadian immigration rules.

What community work did the court consider at sentencing?

The judge noted Devera’s volunteer work delivering meals to unhoused people after conviction. This supported the finding of rehabilitation and a low risk to the public.

Where can people find crisis support and sexual violence resources in Canada?

Call 988 for Canada’s Suicide Crisis Helpline. Kids Help Phone is at 1‑800‑668‑6868, text 686868, or live chat. The Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention lists 24-hour centres. CAMH provides guidance on discussing suicide. For sexual violence support, see the Ending Sexual Violence Association of Canada database or call 911 in immediate danger.

How did Canadian media frame the court decision and related lawsuits?

Outlets emphasized the judge’s reasoning—rehabilitation, minimal risk, proportionality—while reporting on additional charges against Probst and civil filings. Coverage balanced open court principles with careful language and context.

How is survivor privacy balanced with public interest?

Media used initials such as X, A, and G, protected identifying details, and reported facts tested in court. This aligns with Canadian standards on trauma-informed reporting.

What language guidelines were followed around suicide and trauma?

Reports avoided sensational details, included verified timelines, and provided help resources. This follows national guidance to reduce harm.

What context did the court provide about Wendy Devera’s relationship with Probst?

Judge Costom described the relationship as an anomaly relative to Devera’s character. She noted Devera ended it before Probst’s death. This factored into assessing risk and rehabilitation.

What rehabilitation steps did Devera take?

She completed sessions with a sexologist focused on consent, maintained steady work, and engaged in volunteer service. Expert evaluations and letters of support reinforced these steps.

Why are terms like “Montreal woman” and “general hospital Montreal” appearing in searches?

Public interest in the case drives searches linking Devera’s name to Montreal institutions and related topics. This includes Stephan Probst, Rocket Doctor Quebec, Entourage Spa, House Doctor, and Hockey Canada sexual assault.

Where can readers find more about Wendy Devera online?

Searches may surface terms such as Wendy Devera website, Wendy Devera bio, Wendy Devera portfolio, Wendy Devera SEO specialist, Wendy Devera services, Wendy Devera contact, and Wendy Devera blog. Always verify sources and distinguish court-established facts from unverified claims.

.2 million remained with Devera. Plaintiffs allege these moves aimed to frustrate creditors; none of these allegations have been proven.What is known about business directorship changes?Records indicate Probst named Devera a director of Stephan Probst Medical Services on May 15, 2025, weeks before his death. Plaintiffs cite this in alleging attempts to shield assets, which is contested and unproven.How does Devera’s permanent resident status affect immigration risks?Because she did not receive a custodial sentence of six months or more, she can challenge a removal order. The community sentence and probation shape how appeals can proceed under Canadian immigration rules.What community work did the court consider at sentencing?The judge noted Devera’s volunteer work delivering meals to unhoused people after conviction. This supported the finding of rehabilitation and a low risk to the public.Where can people find crisis support and sexual violence resources in Canada?Call 988 for Canada’s Suicide Crisis Helpline. Kids Help Phone is at 1‑800‑668‑6868, text 686868, or live chat. The Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention lists 24-hour centres. CAMH provides guidance on discussing suicide. For sexual violence support, see the Ending Sexual Violence Association of Canada database or call 911 in immediate danger.How did Canadian media frame the court decision and related lawsuits?Outlets emphasized the judge’s reasoning—rehabilitation, minimal risk, proportionality—while reporting on additional charges against Probst and civil filings. Coverage balanced open court principles with careful language and context.How is survivor privacy balanced with public interest?Media used initials such as X, A, and G, protected identifying details, and reported facts tested in court. This aligns with Canadian standards on trauma-informed reporting.What language guidelines were followed around suicide and trauma?Reports avoided sensational details, included verified timelines, and provided help resources. This follows national guidance to reduce harm.What context did the court provide about Wendy Devera’s relationship with Probst?Judge Costom described the relationship as an anomaly relative to Devera’s character. She noted Devera ended it before Probst’s death. This factored into assessing risk and rehabilitation.What rehabilitation steps did Devera take?She completed sessions with a sexologist focused on consent, maintained steady work, and engaged in volunteer service. Expert evaluations and letters of support reinforced these steps.Why are terms like “Montreal woman” and “general hospital Montreal” appearing in searches?Public interest in the case drives searches linking Devera’s name to Montreal institutions and related topics. This includes Stephan Probst, Rocket Doctor Quebec, Entourage Spa, House Doctor, and Hockey Canada sexual assault.Where can readers find more about Wendy Devera online?Searches may surface terms such as Wendy Devera website, Wendy Devera bio, Wendy Devera portfolio, Wendy Devera SEO specialist, Wendy Devera services, Wendy Devera contact, and Wendy Devera blog. Always verify sources and distinguish court-established facts from unverified claims.

in May 2025. Shortly after, a Plateau-Mont-Royal condo was sold for 0,000, and a downtown condo originally purchased for more than

FAQ

What did the Quebec Court rule in the sentencing of the Montreal woman, Wendy Devera?

Judge Suzanne Costom gave Wendy Devera a community sentence of two years less one day. The first year is house arrest, followed by a year with a curfew and conditions. She must also do two years of probation and 240 hours of community service. The court did not order jail time.

Why is the conviction for sexual assault involving another person treated more seriously?

The Criminal Code sees sexual assault with another person as more serious. It shows more power dynamics and harm. The court recognized its gravity while balancing the sentence.

How does this roundup frame the court’s findings and public interest?

It summarizes the conditional sentence and the judge’s focus on rehabilitation. It also mentions ongoing civil actions and resources for readers. This shows strong public interest in Montreal and across Canada.

What does “two years less a day” mean in practice?

It’s a community sentence served outside jail. Devera will be under strict supervision for 12 months at home. Then, she’ll have a curfew and conditions for another 12 months. It allows for closer rehabilitation while keeping accountability.

What are the house arrest and curfew conditions?

For the first 12 months, Devera must stay at home except for approved activities. The next 12 months will have a curfew and court-ordered conditions. These will be monitored by community supervision.

What are the probation and community service requirements?

After the community sentence, Devera must do two years of probation. This includes 240 hours of community service. These measures support rehabilitation and community accountability.

How did the judge assess rehabilitation and consent education?

Judge Costom credited Devera’s work with a sexologist focused on consent. She also looked at expert evaluations and letters of support. The court found she had started rehabilitation before sentencing and showed insight into boundaries and consent.

Why did the court find an “exceptionally weak” risk of reoffending?

Expert reports and character evidence suggested the offence was out of character. The judge concluded Devera would likely not have offended without her relationship with Stephan Probst.

Why was a community‑based sentence seen as proportional and deterrent?

The court believed strict community controls, house arrest, and long probation could meet denunciation and deterrence. This was done while prioritizing rehabilitation due to the isolated incident and lack of prior convictions.

Why was Devera not placed on Canada’s sex offender registry?

The judge found the legal criteria were not met. This was due to her demonstrated rehabilitation, minimal risk, and case-specific circumstances. The proportional sentence was considered sufficient to protect the public.

How do registry decisions relate to proportional sentencing?

Courts weigh risk, rehabilitation, and the offence context. If denunciation and deterrence are achieved without a registry listing, and risk is low, judges may decline to impose registration.

What might this mean for similar cases in Canada?

It reinforces that registry placement is case-specific. Courts examine risk assessments, rehabilitation steps, and character evidence alongside the seriousness of the offence.

Who was Dr. Stephan Probst, and how is he connected?

Probst was the former head of nuclear medicine at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and Devera’s co-accused. Both were convicted in the incident involving victim X.

What happened to Probst before sentencing?

Probst died by suicide in June 2025 before he could be sentenced and after being charged with additional sexual assaults. Help resources are listed below for anyone affected by this topic.

Were there other accusations and civil actions related to Probst?

Prosecutors charged Probst with additional assaults alleged by several women. Two women, identified as A and G, filed civil suits against his estate. Their allegations have not been tested in court.

What do the civil lawsuits by A and G allege?

A alleges she was recruited by Devera via an app and that Probst participated without consent; G alleges Probst drugged and assaulted her starting in 2012 and does not allege misconduct by Devera. These claims remain before the civil courts.

What are the allegations about property transfers and a condo sale?

Court filings claim Probst transferred two properties to Devera for $0 in May 2025. Shortly after, a Plateau-Mont-Royal condo was sold for $470,000, and a downtown condo originally purchased for more than $1.2 million remained with Devera. Plaintiffs allege these moves aimed to frustrate creditors; none of these allegations have been proven.

What is known about business directorship changes?

Records indicate Probst named Devera a director of Stephan Probst Medical Services on May 15, 2025, weeks before his death. Plaintiffs cite this in alleging attempts to shield assets, which is contested and unproven.

How does Devera’s permanent resident status affect immigration risks?

Because she did not receive a custodial sentence of six months or more, she can challenge a removal order. The community sentence and probation shape how appeals can proceed under Canadian immigration rules.

What community work did the court consider at sentencing?

The judge noted Devera’s volunteer work delivering meals to unhoused people after conviction. This supported the finding of rehabilitation and a low risk to the public.

Where can people find crisis support and sexual violence resources in Canada?

Call 988 for Canada’s Suicide Crisis Helpline. Kids Help Phone is at 1‑800‑668‑6868, text 686868, or live chat. The Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention lists 24-hour centres. CAMH provides guidance on discussing suicide. For sexual violence support, see the Ending Sexual Violence Association of Canada database or call 911 in immediate danger.

How did Canadian media frame the court decision and related lawsuits?

Outlets emphasized the judge’s reasoning—rehabilitation, minimal risk, proportionality—while reporting on additional charges against Probst and civil filings. Coverage balanced open court principles with careful language and context.

How is survivor privacy balanced with public interest?

Media used initials such as X, A, and G, protected identifying details, and reported facts tested in court. This aligns with Canadian standards on trauma-informed reporting.

What language guidelines were followed around suicide and trauma?

Reports avoided sensational details, included verified timelines, and provided help resources. This follows national guidance to reduce harm.

What context did the court provide about Wendy Devera’s relationship with Probst?

Judge Costom described the relationship as an anomaly relative to Devera’s character. She noted Devera ended it before Probst’s death. This factored into assessing risk and rehabilitation.

What rehabilitation steps did Devera take?

She completed sessions with a sexologist focused on consent, maintained steady work, and engaged in volunteer service. Expert evaluations and letters of support reinforced these steps.

Why are terms like “Montreal woman” and “general hospital Montreal” appearing in searches?

Public interest in the case drives searches linking Devera’s name to Montreal institutions and related topics. This includes Stephan Probst, Rocket Doctor Quebec, Entourage Spa, House Doctor, and Hockey Canada sexual assault.

Where can readers find more about Wendy Devera online?

Searches may surface terms such as Wendy Devera website, Wendy Devera bio, Wendy Devera portfolio, Wendy Devera SEO specialist, Wendy Devera services, Wendy Devera contact, and Wendy Devera blog. Always verify sources and distinguish court-established facts from unverified claims.

.2 million remained with Devera. Plaintiffs allege these moves aimed to frustrate creditors; none of these allegations have been proven.

What is known about business directorship changes?

Records indicate Probst named Devera a director of Stephan Probst Medical Services on May 15, 2025, weeks before his death. Plaintiffs cite this in alleging attempts to shield assets, which is contested and unproven.

How does Devera’s permanent resident status affect immigration risks?

Because she did not receive a custodial sentence of six months or more, she can challenge a removal order. The community sentence and probation shape how appeals can proceed under Canadian immigration rules.

What community work did the court consider at sentencing?

The judge noted Devera’s volunteer work delivering meals to unhoused people after conviction. This supported the finding of rehabilitation and a low risk to the public.

Where can people find crisis support and sexual violence resources in Canada?

Call 988 for Canada’s Suicide Crisis Helpline. Kids Help Phone is at 1‑800‑668‑6868, text 686868, or live chat. The Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention lists 24-hour centres. CAMH provides guidance on discussing suicide. For sexual violence support, see the Ending Sexual Violence Association of Canada database or call 911 in immediate danger.

How did Canadian media frame the court decision and related lawsuits?

Outlets emphasized the judge’s reasoning—rehabilitation, minimal risk, proportionality—while reporting on additional charges against Probst and civil filings. Coverage balanced open court principles with careful language and context.

How is survivor privacy balanced with public interest?

Media used initials such as X, A, and G, protected identifying details, and reported facts tested in court. This aligns with Canadian standards on trauma-informed reporting.

What language guidelines were followed around suicide and trauma?

Reports avoided sensational details, included verified timelines, and provided help resources. This follows national guidance to reduce harm.

What context did the court provide about Wendy Devera’s relationship with Probst?

Judge Costom described the relationship as an anomaly relative to Devera’s character. She noted Devera ended it before Probst’s death. This factored into assessing risk and rehabilitation.

What rehabilitation steps did Devera take?

She completed sessions with a sexologist focused on consent, maintained steady work, and engaged in volunteer service. Expert evaluations and letters of support reinforced these steps.

Why are terms like “Montreal woman” and “general hospital Montreal” appearing in searches?

Public interest in the case drives searches linking Devera’s name to Montreal institutions and related topics. This includes Stephan Probst, Rocket Doctor Quebec, Entourage Spa, House Doctor, and Hockey Canada sexual assault.

Where can readers find more about Wendy Devera online?

Searches may surface terms such as Wendy Devera website, Wendy Devera bio, Wendy Devera portfolio, Wendy Devera SEO specialist, Wendy Devera services, Wendy Devera contact, and Wendy Devera blog. Always verify sources and distinguish court-established facts from unverified claims.